Two appeals were filed challenging convictions for abduction, kidnapping, and attempted murder. The High Court reviewed the trial court's judgment and prosecution evidence. Finding no infirmities, the court dismissed both appeals and upheld the conviction and sentencing.
Appeals dismissed; conviction and sentence of appellants upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 1212 of 2013
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
CRA No. 5 of 2014
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellants : Shri Deepak Jain and Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocates. For Respondent/State: Shri Avinash K. Mishra, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Judgment on Board
13/12/2018
2
sentencing them with fine of Rs.200/-, R.I. for 5 years, R.I. for 7 years, R. I. for 7 years along with fine of Rs.200/-, Rs.200/-, and Rs.200/- with default stipulations and direction that all the jail sentences shall run concurrently.
3
and as per the information received, they have completed the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon them and they have been released thereafter.
Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction and sentencing of the appellants under charges of abduction and attempt to murder are erroneous.
Whether the prosecution evidence is reliable and trustworthy to support the conviction.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajkumar S/o Gorelal Vastrakar
Ranjit Vastrakar S/o Raj Kumar Vastrakar
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
