Brijlal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was disposed due to abatement. Counsel informed that the appellant expired on 27.10.2017 and his legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
The appeal was disposed due to abatement. Counsel informed that the appellant expired on 27.10.2017 and his legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CR.A. No. 1131 of 2013
Brijlal Sahu, S/o. Bhukhau Sahu, aged about 40 years, R/o. Village – Phuljhar (Bodki), Post – Office & Police Station – Fingeshwar, District – Gariyaband (C.G.)
….Appellant
Versus
State of C.G., through : the District Magistrate, Gariyaband, District – Gariyaband (C.G.)
---Repsondent
| 03/12/2018 | Mr. Shivendu Pandya, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Madhunisha Singh, P.L. for the State. PUD has been received from the Court of Special Judge, Atrocity Act informing that the appellant Brijlal Sahu, S/o. Bhukhau Sahu has expired on 27.10.2017. Copy of the death certificate certified by the S.H.O., Police Station Fingeshwar is also attached. Counsel for the appellant informs that the legal representative of the appellant are not interested to prosecute this appeal, hence, because of abatement, this appeal is disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
|---|---|
| balram |
Brijlal Sahu
State of C.G.
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court