Disposed
Sukh Sai v. the State of C.G
Chhattisgarh HCCRA/1040/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the criminal appeal as abated on account of the death of the appellant, noting that no legal representative appeared.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is abated; no legal representative has appeared for the appellant.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
NAFR
¶2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRA No. 1040 of 2001
¶3
- Sukhsai, Son of Kelha Tigga aged about 24 years, resident of Fokatpara, Ghargoda, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).
¶4
---- Appellant Versus
¶5
• The State Of Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Appellant : None. For Respondents/State : UKS Chandel, Panel Lawyer.
¶6
Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
¶7
Order On Board
¶8
09/07/2018
¶9
- Bailable warrant sent earlier returned as unserved with a report that accused/appellant has died on 09-09-2015. Death certificate of the accused is also annexed with the report.
¶10
- Since, the appellant has died and no legal representative is appeared on behalf of the appellant, therefore, the case is abated on his behalf.
¶11
Sd/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sukhsai Son of Kelha Tigga
- respondent
The State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
AI extract
Arvind Singh Chandel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA/1040/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court