Dismissed

Dayaram v. Sonmadi Bora

Chhattisgarh HC5 Mar 2018CONT/55/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Individual workmen filed contempt petitions alleging officers willfully disobeyed an interim order vacating a stay on reinstatement. The Court held no contempt was made out as the interim order lacked a specific direction to reinstate or pay wages under Section 17(B) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

What did the court decide?

All contamination petitions are dismissed; petitioners left to workout remedy in pending writ petitions or before executing court.

Dayaram Vs Sonmadi Bora — Contempt of Court | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

CONT No. 702 of 2017

¶4

Shailesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri S. B. Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Ex. Gage Reader, R/o Behind I. B. Road, Ward No. 18, P. S. And Tahsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Amitabh Jain Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶8

S. L. Yadav, Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. , District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Shashank Singh Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal Water Management Sub Division Ill, Birra, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. , District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶10

---- Respondents

¶11

CONT No. 3 of 2018

¶12

Viriksha Ram S/o Shri Ram Prasad Kashyap, Aged About 45 Years Ex. Helper, R/o Avarid, Post Semara, Police Station Navagarh And Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶13

---- Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

Sonmadi Bora Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶16

S.L.Yadav Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶17

Shashank Singh, Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division-I I I, Birra, Janjgir, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ...............Contemnors, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶18

---- Respondents

¶19

CONT No. 26 of 2018

¶20

Ramcharan S/o Late Paras Ram Shrivas, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Kapan, Tahsil Akaltara, Police Station Naila, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶21

---- Petitioner

¶22

Versus

¶23

Sonmadi Bora Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶24

S.L.Yadav, Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶25

Hitendra Rathore, Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division-I I I, Birra, Janjgir, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ...............Contemnors, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶26

---- Respondents

¶27

CONT No. 27 of 2018

¶28

Maniram S/o Moti Lal Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Ex.Side Helper, R/o Village Semara, P.S. And Tahsil Nawagarh, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶29

---- Petitioner

¶30

Versus

¶31

Sonmadi Bora Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

¶32

S.L.Yadav, Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶33

Shashank Singh, Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division-I I I, Birra, Janjgir, District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ...............Contemnors, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶34

---- Respondents

¶35

CONT No. 55 of 2018

¶36

Dayaram S/o Shri Sudarshan Aged About 40 Years Ex. Helper, R/o Avarid, Post Semara, Police Station Navagarh And Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶37

---- Petitioner

¶38

Versus

¶39

Sonmadi Bora Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶40

S.L.Yadav Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District :

¶41

Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶42

Hitendra Rathore Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division-Iii, Birra, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶43

---- Respondents

¶44

CONT No. 56 of 2018

¶45

Jagatram S/o Shri Jugulram Sahu Aged About 50 Years Ex. Helper, R/o Semara, Post Semara, Police Station And Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶46

---- Petitioner

¶47

Versus

¶48

Sonmadi Bora Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶49

S.L.Yadav Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶50

Shashank Singh Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division-Iii, Birra, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶51

---- Respondents

¶52

CONT No. 67 of 2018

¶53

Nammu Prasad Dhiwar S/o Shri Jethuram Aged About 48 Years Ex. Labour , R/o Avarid, Po-Semara, Ps And Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶54

---- Petitioner

¶55

Versus

¶56

Sonmadi Bora Secretary, Water Resources Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶57

S.L. Yadav Executive Engineer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Division, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶58

Hitendra Rathore, Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Canal, Water Management Sub Division - Iii, Birra, Janjgir, District - Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶59

---- Respondents

¶60

For petitioner : Mr. Vinod Deshmukh & Mr. KPS Gandhi, Advocates. For State : Mr. Satish Gupta -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶61

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

¶62

Order on Board

¶63

05/03/2018

¶64

These contempt petitions have been filed by individual workman against the officers of the State alleging willful disobedience of orders passed in their respective cases whereby the order of stay of reinstatement, passed earlier in the petitions filed by the State was vacated.

¶65

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that against the award of reinstatement passed in favour of individual applicants in their respective petitions, the State had preferred separate petitions challenging the awards. Initially, an interim order of stay of reinstatement was passed by this Court. However, later on it was brought to the notice of the Court by the workmen that on the date when the writ petitioner filed petition and made prayer for interim relief, workmen were already reinstated. Upon this disclosure, the interim orders passed earlier in all the cases were vacated. Further submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in view of the observations that reinstatement would be subject to final outcome of the petition, upon vacating interim order, the representation was under an obligation to immediately reinstate each of the workmen without insisting on filing any kind of affidavit which has been done in the present case. He would submit that the last drawn wages ought to be immediately paid without insisting on filing the affidavit.

¶66

Learned counsel for the applicant would further submit that letters which has been issued to individual applicants and which are identical in its contents, are against the spirit of order passed by this Court in each of the petitions vacating earlier stay order which was passed in favour of the State.

¶67

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, appearing for officers who is also present in the Court would submit that there was no

¶68

intention to flout any order of the Court. He would submit that officers on his own understanding of the provision contained in Section 17(B) Industrial Dispute Act, issued letters only to fecilitate payment of wages. In any case, it is argued, unless there is specific direction by the Court, it cannot be said that vacating of stay would oblige Respondent authority to reinstate the employee where the award is executable.

¶69

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find that in all the cases that award of reinstatement was challenged by the state by filing seperate petitions, an interim orders were passed staying execution of award and reinstatement of individual workman subject to compliance of Section 17(B) of the ID Act. However, the workmen moved applications for vacating stay and this Court having found that the workmen were initially reinstated in service and later on , petition was filed and stay was granted, only on that ground interim orders were vacated.

¶70

However, there was no positive direction by this Court to respondents to reinstate the workmen or pay monetary benefits. A claim under the law may be enforceable in the Court and even assuming that the workmen are entitled to payment of last wages drawn subject to fulfillment of statutory requirement incorporated under Section 17(B) of the Industrial Dispute Act, in the absence of there being any such direction in the order vacating interim order, in my considered opinion, no case of contempt is made out. The contempt petitioners are left to workout their remedy to seek either reinstatement in service or for payment of last wages drawn under Section 17(B) of the Industrial dispute Act either in the pending writ petitions or before the executing Court. All contempt petitions are accordingly dismissed.

¶71

Sd/-

¶72

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava)

¶73

Judge

¶74

Rohit

Dayaram v. Sonmadi Bora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dayaram v. Sonmadi Bora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anoop Kumar Purabiya Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Hanuman Singh Thakur Vs Shri D. R. Reddy

General Manager Vs Chandrabhan

Jagatram Vs Sonmadi Bora

Nammu Prasad Dhiwar Vs Sonmadi Bora

Smt. Mamta Rani Warde Vs State of Chhattisgarh