In a writ petition filed by M/s Kamal Trading Company against SAIL officials, the petitioner failed to appear nor make any representation when the case was called for the second hearing. The bench dismissed the petition for want of prosecution by a single bench order dated June 19, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 448 of 2017
M/s Kamal Trading Company A Partnership Firm Registered Under The Relevant Provisions Of The Partnership Act, 1932, Having Its Office At 85, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai 490026, Chhattisgarh, India.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner: For Respondents:
None. Shri Kashif Shakeel, Advocate.
Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board
19.06.2018
Sd/(Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE
Nikita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be dismissed when the petitioner fails to appear or make representation during the second round of hearing.
M/s Kamal Trading Company A Partnership Firm
Steel Authority Of India Limited
Shri Shrikant Shrivastava
Ms. Indira V. P.
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
