Acquittal appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared to press the notice on behalf of the appellant Vijay Kumar Nishad.
Acquittal appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
ACQA No. 179 of 2017
Vijay Kumar Nishad S/o Budhlal Nishad, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kailashgarh, Police Station Lavan Kasdol District BalodabazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For the Appellant :- Mr. Suresh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondents :- Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Shri Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order on Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
02.07.2018
Sd/Sd/-
Judge Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Vimla Singh Kapoor
Santsoh
Vijay Kumar Nishad
State Of Chhattisgarh
Chandrakumar
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
