Petitioner sought interest on GPF accumulation from 2007. Court held delay was not deliberate or mala fide and dismissed the writ petition.
Interest claim on GPF amount was rejected and writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 6536 of 2008
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner None For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Adv. For Respondent No.2 Shri N.K. Vyas, Asstt. SG
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
05/05/2017
favour of the petitioner was sent on 6-1-2007 showing the Head of
Account as 4701 being a Major Head which could have been drawn by the concerned Treasury and the department, therefore, there is no delay on the part of the Accountant General office, which maintains the GPF account of the State Government employees.
Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gowri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interest is payable on GPF amount due to administrative delay in approval and transmission of authorization.
Mohan Gaikwad
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
