This bench allowed the petition, ordering the respondents to consider the petitioner's service under SADA, Bhilai for pensionary benefits, following a previous common order.
Direction to the Respondents to consider the service rendered by the Petitioner under SADA, Bhilai for granting pensionary benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 231 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Petitioner | Mr. Alok Tiwari,Advocate |
|---|---|
| For State | Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General |
| For Municipal Corporation | Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. |
| Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate |
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice P.Sam Koshy
Order On Board
17.01.2017
2
Petition (S) No. 4459/2014 and analogous Writ Petitions.
3
subsequently merged with Respondent No.3 to be considered for the purpose of calculating length of service as well as pensionary benefits.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kishore
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits for service rendered under the Special Area Development Authority, Bhilai.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Common order dated 08.02.2016Followed¶6
Writ Petition (S) No. 4459/2014
Division Bench decision dated 22.06.2016Relied on¶5
Writ Appeal No. 185/2016
Majnu S/o Late Shri Bhoklu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Municipal Corporation, Bhilai
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
