Disposed

Hiralal Vishwakarma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 May 2017WPS/2213/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding unpaid pay-scale arrears and leave encashment, the High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the matter by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's fresh representations within one month, with a mandate to conclude the decision within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directs the competent authority to decide the petitioner's fresh representation on merits within one month, preferably concluding within three months.

Hiralal Vishwakarma Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 2213 of 2017

¶5

Hiralal Vishwakarma S/o Babadin Vishwakarma, Aged About 69 Years Retired Deputy Ranger, Forest Division Manendragarh, Surguja Circle, Ambikapur, District Koriya (Chhattisgarh).

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶9

Conservator of Forest, Surguja Area, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh).

¶10

Divisional Forest Officer, Manendragarh, District Koriya (Chhattisgarh).

¶11

Joint Director, Accounts, Treasury And Pension, Ambikapur, Surguja Division (Chhattisgarh).

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner : Shri CJK Rao, Advocate For Respondents-State : Shri Satish Gupta, GA for the State

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶15

Order On Board

¶16

11/05/2017

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that although the petitioner has been allowed benefit of time bound pay-scale, however, the arrears thereof has still not been paid. He would also submit that the petitioner is

¶18

entitled to certain amount under the leave encashment and for both of the

¶19

reliefs he has filed representation, which has not yet been decided.

¶20

Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that in the event the petitioner prefers fresh

¶21

representation before the competent authority within a period of one month

¶22

¶23

from today, the said authority shall decide the representation, on its own merits, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of representation.

¶24

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Judge

¶27

Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶28

Ashu

Hiralal Vishwakarma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hiralal Vishwakarma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Tigga Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Daras Ram Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Puniram Chouhan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

R.S. Junarkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Smt. Rajani Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

R. R. Keshkar Vs Yashwant Kumar