The High Court ordered the writ petition without entering into merits, directing that due action follow on allegations of fraud in land register entries and private property disputes while allowing the petitioners to pursue remedies in appropriate jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 57 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Petitioners | : | Shri S.C. Verma, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For State/Respondents | : | Shri Yashwant Singh Thakur, |
| Additional Advocate General |
Hon’ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta, Judge
Order on Board
Per, Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice
02/08/2017
2
attempted to be raised.
Sd/Sd/(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Chief Justice Judge
vatti
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition alleging fraud in land entries and involved private property disputes should be entertained by this Court.
Whether the Court should enter into merits when an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC has been registered.
Whether the petitioners can pursue their remedy in another jurisdiction when the matter involves private rights to property.
Rajnish Sahu S/o Shri P.R. Sahu
Ramkhilawan Sahu S/o Late Shri Ashok Kumar Sahu
The State of Chhattisgarh
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
