In this writ petition, petitioners (investors) sought registration of an FIR alleging cheating by a chit fund company. The court directed petitioners to approach the concerned police station; dismissing the petition as they had not done so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(Cr.) No. 81 of 2017
----Petitioners
Versus
Page No.2
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
06/03/2017
Page No.3
after the maturity, the amount has not been returned, therefore, the report was made to the Superintendent of Police, Rajnandgaon, however, no action is being taken.
case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1 .
Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Balram
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and othersExplained¶46
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Govind Ram Dewangan and others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
