Disposed

Mineshwar Prasad Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC1 Sept 2017WPCR/318/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, grant relief regarding a writ petition concerning non-arrest of an accused in a criminal case and directed the SP and SHO to proceed under Section 170 of Cr.P.C. if a case is made out.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned police station to take up proceedings under Section 170 of the Cr.P.C. if a case is made out.

Mineshwar Prasad Jangde Vs State Of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

W.P.(Cr.) No. 318 of 2017

¶5

Mineshwar Prasad Jangde S/o Late Tula Ram Jangde, Aged About 50 Years R/o A/ 146, Vasant Vihar Colony, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Of Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For the Petitioner : Shri Lalit Jangde, Advocate. For the Respondent/ State : Shri Neeraj Sharma, Deputy G.A.

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant ORDER

¶14

01.09.2017

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has lodged one First Information Report and on the basis of which a case has been registered against the accused concerned. The accused in that case is a teacher in DAV School. Subsequent to lodging of FIR, the police has not made arrest of the accused concerned on the pretext that the accused in the case could not be traced out. Hence, this petition.

¶17

Learned State counsel has opposed the grounds raised in the petition and the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and submitted that the petition may be disposed off with a direction to the concerned police station.

¶18

Perused the record.

¶19

¶20

Considering the submissions made and on perusal of documents on record, it appears that respondent No.3 is independent to conduct investigation and make arrest as per the requirement of the case. However, for the purpose of this petition, it is directed that on the basis of the investigation, if any case is made out, then the proceedings be taken up in accordance with Section 170 of the Cr.P.C., as early as possible.

¶21

With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed off.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge

¶24

Nimmi

Mineshwar Prasad Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mineshwar Prasad Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramprasad Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Jitesh Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Akila Khan and another Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and another

Rameshwar Vs State

Gokul Prasad Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Duleshwari Bai Vs Bala Ram and Ors.