directed trial Court
Directed trial Court to dispose of suit within four months; earlier interim relief to remain in force for four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No.3160 of 2009
Smt. Surendar Kaur Sibbal, aged about 58 years, wife of Shri Devendra Singh Sibbal, resident of Guru Nanak Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and District Raipur. ---- Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Corporation, Raipur through the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Malviya Road, Raipur (CG). --- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
16/11/2017
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the trial Court may be directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously as the suit is pending since 12.01.2009.
(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
(3) Since the suit is pending for a long period (since 12.01.2009), therefore, it would be expedient to direct the trial Court to conclude and dispose of suit after hearing the parties, expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(4) For a period of four months, interim relief granted by this Court on 14.07.2009 shall remain in force.
(5) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
L/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial Court should be directed to dispose of a suit pending since 2009 expeditiously?
Whether an interim relief granted earlier should remain in force for a specified period?
Smt. Surendar Kaur Sibbal
Municipal Corporation, Raipur
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
