No relief. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution because the petitioner was unrepresented during the second hearing.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No.2638 of 2007
Bal Ashram, A registered Society, And incorporated under Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973, having its registered office at Kutechery Chowk, Raipur Through the Administrator, Shri K.K. Bakshi, Aged about 55 years, S/o Shri Gopal Prasad Bakshi, Bal Ashram, Raipur (CG)
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. C.G. Information Commission, Through-Chief Information Commissioner, Nirmal Chhaya Bhawan, Meera Datar Road, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Shri Rakesh Choubey, 10/226, Satti Bazar, Fouwara Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None present For Respondent No.2 : Mr.M.L. Sen, Advocate on behalf of Mr.S.C.Verma, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
01/11/2017
1. When the passed over case is called out for hearing second time,
2. In view of above, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
B/-
Bal Ashram
C.G. Information Commission
Shri Rakesh Choubey
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
