Dismissed

Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Aug 2017WPC/1967/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition regarding the construction of a culvert/drainage to prevent waterlogging. The Court directed the respondent Municipal Corporation to proceed with the work expeditiously in accordance with its affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 directed to proceed with the affidavit expeditiously; Writ petition disposed of.

Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.1967 of 2017

¶4

(Arising out of judgment/order dated ......... in Case No. ...... of the learned......)

¶5

Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Rohinipuram, Raipur, Through Its Vice President Bhakt Bhushan Chandravanshi, S/o Late Shri G.L. Chandravanshi, Aged About 67 Years, R/o E-36, Rohinipuram, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Town Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2. Collector, Raipur, Office Of Collector, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3. Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner	:	Mr.Kishor Bhaduri, Advocate
For Res.No.1 and 2	:	Mr.Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.
For Respondent No.3	:	Mr.Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶14

Order on Board

¶15

16/08/2017

¶16

In compliance of the order dated 18.7.2017, Mr.Rajat Bansod, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur is present before this Court.

¶17

Learned counsel for respondent No.3 would submit that steps are being taken for construction of culvert/drainage to

¶18

¶19

prevent water logging in the petitioner society.

¶20

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that respondent No.3 be directed to comply with the affidavit filed by the said respondent.

¶21

Be that as it may, respondent No.3 is directed to proceed in the lines with the affidavit filed before this Court expeditiously.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. Presence of the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur is dispensed with.

¶23

(Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge

¶24

B/-

Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuber Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daya Lal Patel and Ors. Vs the State of M.P. and Anr.

Maheswar Samal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Prajapati Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Mangli Rajwar Death Legar Heirs Vs Jai Ram Rajwar

Smt.Tulshi Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Ghasiya Ram Vs Kartik Ram