None present. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of petitioner and respondents in court on 21/08/2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.693 of 2009
Vishwanath, aged about 60 years, S/o Chittu, Village Kelhari, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. Korea
---- Petitioner
Versus
Both R/o Village Kelhari, Tahsil Manendragarh, Distt. Korea
---- Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner: None present. For Respondents No.1 and 2: - None present. For Respondents No.3 and 4/State: - Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
21/08/2017
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
Vishwanath
Santosh
Rajendra
State of Chhattisgarh
Additional Collector
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
