Disposed

Krishnakant Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Sept 2017WP227/665/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in this writ petition concerning disputed suit land and a revision filed by the petitioner against an order of the Additional Collector, extended the earlier interim protection of status quo until October 5, 2017. The petitioner filed a revision which the Additional Collector admitted for hearing on July 20, 2017, but later vacated the status quo order on August 25,

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands finally disposed of. The earlier interim order of status quo shall remain in force till the revision petition is finally decided. The Additional Collector, Raipur is directed

Krishnakant Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Land Acquisition | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Pettion (227) No. 665 of 201 7

¶5

Krishnakant Yadav, S/o late Shri Anup Yadav, aged about 40 years, R/o Khamtarai, Police Station Khamtarai, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, through : the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)

¶9

Additional Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

Smt. Meenakshi, W/o N. Ramanna, aged about 56 years, R/o Sanyasipara, Khamtarai, Near Railway Crossing, Police Station Khamtarai, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents/State: Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

14/09 /2017

¶16

(1) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that impunged order dated 25.08.2017 passed by the Additional Collector, Raipur is unsustainable and bad in law and the same is liable to be rejected.

¶17

(2) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the order impugned with utmost circumspection.

¶18

(3) The petitioner preferred revision against the order dated 06.05.2017 before the Additional Collector, Raipur. The Additional Collector, Raipur, by its order dated 20.07.2017, admitted the revision petition for hearing and also directed to maintain status quo with regard to suit land, but on 25.08.2017 vacated the earlier interim order of status quo granted on 20.07.2017 and the case is now fixed for 5^th October, 2017 by the Additional Collector, Raipur.

¶19

¶20

(4) Since the revision preferred by the petitioner has been admitted for hearing and the case is fixed for 5^th October, 2017, it would be expedient to extend the earlier interim protection till 5^th October, 2017 and the Additinoal Collector, Raipur be directed to dispose of the revision petition latest by 31^st October, 2017. Ordered accordingly.

¶21

(5) Till the revision petition is decided finally, earlier interim order of status quo granted on 20.07.2017 shall remain in force.

¶22

(6) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

Judge

D/-

Krishnakant Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnakant Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Shahnawaz Khan Vs Arya Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit

Bhuvaneshwar Prasad Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Anand Ram Tandon Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Kumar Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Shashank Shekhar Mukharji Vs Purshottam Patel

Dinesh Kumar Sonwani Vs Prathmesh Mishra