Petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition. The single judge dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to approach appropriate remedies.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No.292 of 2017
Rajendra Pandey, Aged about 56 years, S/o Shri Kashiprasad Pandey, R/o Urga, Post Kudurmal Near Shyama Tehsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh
---Petitioner
Versus
---Respondents
For petitioner : Mr.Ashutosh Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr.Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
11/04/2017
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE
B/-
Rajendra Pandey
Tulsidas Vaishnav
Dhanraj Chopra
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
