The High Court allowed a writ petition filed under Article 227 challenging the civil court's order closing evidence. The court held it was in the interest of justice to allow petitioners to lead evidence within 15 days.
Afforded opportunity to lead evidence before the court below within 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.227 No. 114 of 2017
Versus
2
---- Respondents
For Petitioners :- Shri Pushpendra Patel, Advocate For Respondent No. 6/State :- Shri Neeraj Sharma Dy. G. A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil Kumar Shukla Order On Board
09/02/2017
3
afford the petitioners an opportunity to lead evidence before the Court below.
Sd/- (Anil Kumar Shukla) JUDGE
Santosh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be allowed to lead evidence after it was closed by the trial court.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Daneshwar Prasad
Jeetram
Dharamlal (Dead)
Anil Kumar Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
