High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent at the second hearing without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No.1103 of 2010
Mohan Lal S/o Motumal Bhimnani, Caste Sindhi, aged about 51 years, R/o Sadar Bazaar, Chandralok Bhawan Main Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Ashok Kumar Mirchandani, aged about 38 years, S/o Mewa Ram Mirchandani, occupation-Business, R/o New Kanchanpur, Sonapur, Near Railway Gate, Jabalpur, Tahsil and District Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh)
2. Laxman Das S/o Motumal Bhimnani, aged about 47 years, Occupation Kastakar, R/o. Sadar Bazaar Chandralok Bhawan, Main Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : None present For Respondent No.1 : Ms Shinali Dubey on behalf of Mr.Shailendra Dubey, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
13/11/2017
1. When the passed over case is called out for hearing second time, none present for the petitioner. No representation is made.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
B/-
Mohan Lal S/o Motumal Bhimnani
Ashok Kumar Mirchandani
Laxman Das S/o Motumal Bhimnani
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
