In W.P. No. 2103 of 2003, the Benches of the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution on the ground that the petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called in the second round.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P. No. 2 103 of 20 0 3
Ramvishal Singh, son of Shri Punch Ram, aged about 51 years, Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Sirkotenga, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : None For State : Shri Majid Ali, PL for the State.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
12/04 /2017
(1) Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
2
Ramvishal Singh
State of Chhattisgarh through Director Public Education Department
Joint Director of Public Education
District Education Officer, Sarguja-Ambikapur
Rewati Singh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
