Single judge Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a review petition challenging an order directing police inquiry in accordance with Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P., finding no requirement for review at the motion stage as no FIR was registered against the applicant.
No temporary or permanent relief was granted pending disposition of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 150 of 2017
---- Applicant
Versus
6. Somnath Bhagat S/o Late Mahali Bhagat, Aged About 62 Years R/o Kusmi, Social Worker, Tehsil Kusmi, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
(By Circulation in Chamber)
SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
Order
04/12/2017
2
reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant)
JUDGE
3
Nisha
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petition seeking review of the order directing police inquiry based on Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. should be entertained.
Whether the applicant's application to remove him from office filed directly before this Court constituted a grievance warranting review.
Whether natural justice was violated in the order directing police inquiry without holding any FIR against the applicant at that stage.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and othersRelied on¶23
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Janmajay Singh
State of Chhattisgarh
Somnath Bhagat
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
