The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by three individuals facing charges of cruelty and obscene acts under Section 498-A IPC. The court held that infringing attempts and the filing of a subsequent report against the applicants negated their entitlement to bail.
The application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1290 of 2016
Versus
For the applicants : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer For the Objector : Mr. Umesh Pandey, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
02.03.2016
who are also part of the crime thereby the offence has been committed.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants apprehending arrest in connection with offences under Sections 498-A and 294 of IPC?
Whether the applicants' attempt to intimidate the complainant and lodge a subsequent false report negates entitlement to anticipatory bail?
Whether the prima facie case is made out against the applicants warranting rejection of the bail application?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Shabana W/o Shri Kazim
Munasib Khan
Hasmat Khan
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
