Single judge rejected bail application in a rape case where accused was alleged to have engaged in sexual intercourse by false promise of marriage, citing nature of allegation.
Bail application stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 5024 of 2017
Deepak Mallah S/o Raju Mallah, aged about 26 years, R/o Shankar Ward, Mungeli, Tahsil & District Mungeli (C.G.).
--- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. City Kotwali, Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.).
| ---Non-applicant | |
|---|---|
| For Applicant | : Shri Kamal Kishor Patel, Advocate. |
| For Complainant | : Shri Anish Tiwari, Advocate. |
| For Respondent/State | : Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay, Dy.G.A. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
23/11/2017
-2-
would by itself reveals that, there was a consensual relationship between the two and prayed for releasing the applicant on bail.
Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Sumit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the applicant in a rape case involving false assurance of marriage.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepak Mallah
State Of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
