Application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and it was dismissed without being entertained because the eye witness statement contained only omnibus allegations.
Second bail application dismissed without being entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3364 of 2017
All of the applicants are R/o Village- Sirkotanga, Police Station Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicants
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Lakhanpur, DistrictSurguja, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For applicants - Shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent/State –Shri Sangarsh Pandey, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order
2/08/2017
2
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be entertained despite the eye witness statement being merely omnibus.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kudar Ram
Dharam Ram Rajwade
Chanda Bai
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
