Allowed

Smt. Asha Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Sept 2017MCC/693/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows the restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005, which was dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the petitioner's absence on the previous date was based on bona fide grounds. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 5000 to the High Court Legal Aid Committee within ten days.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005 subject to payment of Rs. 5000 to the High Court Legal Aid Committee within ten days.

Smt. Asha Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCC No. 693 of 2017

¶5

(Arising out of judgment/order dated 24.07.2017 in Case No. Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005 of the learned Hon'ble Court)

¶6

Smt. Asha Yadav W/o Shri Rajendra Yadav, Aged about 32 years, presently posted as Lower Division Clerk, Chhattisgarh Paryavaran Sanrakshan Mandal (Pollution Control Board) Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

---- Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Housing and Environment Department, D.K.S. Bhawan (now Mahanadi Bhawan), Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

State of Madhya Pradesh, through The Principal Secretary, M.P. Govt. Housing and Environment Department, Mantralaya, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M.P.)

¶11

Secretary, Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Bhopal (M.P.)

¶12

President, Chhattisgarh Paryavaran Sanrakshan Mandal (Pollution Control Board) Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶13

Secretary, Housing & Environment Department, State of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶14

Chief Engineer and Special Vigilance Officer, Chhattisgarh, Pollution Control Board, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

---- Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhayay, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶18

Order On Board

¶19

19/09/17

¶20

Heard on application for restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005.

¶21

The applicant is seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005

¶22

¶23

which was dismissed by this Court for want of prosecution vide order dated 24.07.2017.

¶24

On due consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the grounds taken in the restoration petition, I am satisfied that the absence of the applicant's counsel on 24.07.2017, when the Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005 was taken up for hearing, was based on bonafide grounds.

¶25

The M.C.C. No. 693 of 2017 is, therefore, allowed and the Writ Petition No. 6150 of 2005 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5000/- (Five Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Aid Committee within ten days from today.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Sanjay K. Agrawal )

¶28

Judge

¶29

Priyanka

Smt. Asha Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Asha Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ali Nadeem Zaidi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kripa Ram Sahu Vs Md.C.G. Adhosan.Vikas Nigam and Others

Vijay Lal Sidar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Kumar Modi Vs Smt. Madhu Agrawal

Noor Gani Ansari Vs General Public And Ors.

M/s Suresh Kumar Goyal Vs South Eastern Coal Fields Limited