The High Court of Chhattisgarth granted condonation of delay for filing an M.C.C. and allowed restoration of a first appeal previously dismissed as peremptory, permitting the matter to be re-listed.
Condonation of delay in filing M.C.C. No. 416 of 2017 allowed. F.A. No. 367/2016 restored to original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 416 of 2017
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For Respondent : None present.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker
Order On Board
20/11/2017
Heard on I.A. No.01, application for condonation of delay in filing the M.C.C.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the M.C.C. is condoned.
Also heard on M.C.C. No. 416/2017 application for restoration of F.A. No. 367/2016 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 27.07.2016 on account of order being peremptory in nature.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and F.A. No. 367/2016 is restored to its original number.
Sd/-
(Pritinker Diwaker) Judge
suguna
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of delay and restoration of a dismissed letter of appeal should be allowed.
Whether F.A. No. 367/2016 can be restored after being dismissed as peremptory.
Whether the reasons given for delay justify condonation.
Dukhit Ram S/o Shri Kartik Ram
Smt. Sharda Devi W/o Shri Ramvriksha Ram
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
