6. Having considered the contention put forth on either side, so far as the issue of enhancement is concerned, undisputedly, the doctor has not been examined. Likewise, the certificate of permanent disability also has not been produced before the Court so as to assess the disability which the claimant had sustained. The accident and the resultant injury in the present case are not in dispute. The treatment which the claimant had undertaken at two places also is not in dispute as the Tribunal itself has allowed all the bills which were raised by the claimant. The nature of injury sustained appears to be a fracture of waist and there appears to be some blockage which arose because of clotting of blood in urinary track. Taking into account the nature of injury sustained and the period of treatment which the claimant has undergone, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the claimant is awarded an additional lump sum compensation of Rs.50,000/- in addition to Rs.1,17,000/- as has been awarded by the Tribunal taking the total compensation payable to the claimant at Rs.1,67,000/-. It is ordered
