Allowed

Smt. Shilpi Ray and Anr. v. Umashankar Sahu and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Dec 2017MAC/437/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

National Lok Adalat accepted an amicable compromise settlement between appellants and respondents regarding a vehicle accident. Orders Oriental Insurance to pay an additional Rs. 3,25,000 as compensation within two months, with 6% interest thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Order Oriental Insurance to pay Rs. 3,25,000 as additional compensation within two months, with 6% per annum interest until realization.

Smt. Shilpi Ray and Anr. Vs Umashankar Sahu and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

Judge~Lok Adalat Hon'ble Mr. Justice^{SanjayK.Agrawal} Member-LokAdalat: Mr. Prafull^{N.Bharat.Advocate}

¶4

MAC No.437 of 2014

¶5

x_ . Smt. Shilpi Ray, aged^about26 years,^{wifeofLateManishRay}

¶6

Ku. Urvasi Ray, aged^{about3months,D/oLateManishRay,}

¶7

Appellant No.2 Minor through Mother Smt. Shilpi Ray. Both resident of Construction Colony, Tarbahar, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Civil^{andRevenueDistrictBilaspur} (CG)

¶8

Versus

¶9

Umashakar Sahu, aged about 30 years, son of Ganesh Ram Sahu, residence of village Bansakara, tahsil Simga, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh^{throughParamjeetSinghBhatiaM/sBhatia} Petrol Pump Simga, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Truck Din/er 06.04 C_E./5491

¶10

I‘J Paramjeet Singh Bhatia,^{agedabout——~—years,sonofGurDayal} Singh Bhatia, M/s Bhatia Petrol Pump, Simga, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (owner^{TruckNo.C.G.O4*C.E./5491)}

¶11

Branch Manager, Branch No.2, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Mahaveer Gaushala^{Complex,Moudhapara,} Raipur, C.G. Through Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, In front of High Court, Bilaspur (CG)

¶12

Maniklal Ray, aged about 65 years, Son of Late S.K. Ray, residence of Vivekanand Nagar, Mopka, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG)

¶13

--- RespOndents

¶14

For Appellants : Mr,C.J.K,Rao, Advocate R’For Respondent^No.3” : Mr. N.K.Malviya,^Advocate None present for^{otherrespondents.}

¶15

¶16

AWARD (Passed^{on09thDecember,2017)}

¶17

¶18

‘to The contesting parties this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We^{havealsofoundthatthetermsandconditions} of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable and and we by the accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed and order that in addition to the amount of compensation parties awarded by^{theTribunal,therespondentNo.3,TheOrientalInsurance} Company^Limitedshall pay^{totheappellantsasumofRs.3,25,000/—} (Three^{LacsTwentyFiveThousandOnly)bywayofcompensation,} within two months from today, otherwise, interest @^6% per^annum from the^dateof present^{award,shallalsobepayabletillitsrealization.}

¶19

»\\ Sd/é%*c (Pralfull/N.^Bharat) ‘ Member-LokAdalat High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} Bilaspur

¶20

' Sd/,7 .,,... M i" W K’. Wg‘^W rawal)"f (Sanjay Judge-Lek^Adalat High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} ' Bilaspur

¶21

Smt. Shilpi Ray and Anr. v. Umashankar Sahu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Shilpi Ray and Anr. v. Umashankar Sahu and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Mohan Clothing Company Private Limited Vs Raipur Treasure Island Private Limited

M/s Sunil Kumar Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Meinhardt Singapore Pte. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation Bilaspur

Smt.sharda Shukla And Ors. Vs Ishawar @ Shankar Baghel And Ors.

Orelus Kerketta and Ors. Vs Krishna Singh and Ors.

Harilal And Ors. Vs Bhola Prasad Yadav And Ors.