Allowed

Smt.shivrani Khaaparde And Ors. v. Chingru Ram Baghel And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC9 Sept 2017MAC/1/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In misc. appeal (C) No. 01/2014, parties amicably settled the dispute. The Lok Adalat accepted the compromise, directing the insurance respondent to pay Rs. 31,34,000 as additional compensation within 60 days with 9% annual interest on default.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Insurance Company to pay Rs. 31,34,000 as compensation within 60 days with 9% per annum interest on default.

Smt.shivrani Khaaparde And Ors. Vs Chingru Ram Baghel And Ors. — Insurance | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

$Qo

¶2

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

Judge^- Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Member^- Lok Adalat : Shri Prafulla N. Bharat, Advocate

¶4

Misc. Appeal (C) No. 01 of 2014

¶5

Smt.Shivrani Khaaparde And Ors. W/o Late Vishnu Khaaparde Aged About 40 Years R/o Ratnabandha Basti, Dhamtari, Tah. And P.S. Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari C.G.

¶6

“W

¶7

Durgesh Khhaparde Slo Late Vishnu Khaaparde Aged About 2O Years R/o Ratnabandha Basti, Dhamtari, Tah. And P.S. Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari C.G.

¶8

Ku. Reshma Khaaparde D/o Late Vishnu Khaaparde Aged About 18 Years R/o Ratnabandha Basti. Dhamtari, Tah. And RS. Dhamtari, Distt. Dhamtari C.G.

¶9

Ku. Ragni Khaaparde D/o Late Vishnu Khaaparde Aged About 16 Years Minor, ThruMother Smt. Shivrani Khaaparde, R/o Ratnabandha Basti, Dhamtari, Tah. And P.S. Dhamtari. Distt. Dhamtari C.G.

Appellants

Versus

’ggyf

Chingru Ram Baghel And Ors. S/o Roop Singh Baghei Aged About 23 Years R/o Khadakghat, Purana Raipur Road, Near Hanuman Mandir, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar C.G.

¶14

Vinay Nair S/o Late M.R. Nair R/o Sanjay Gandhi Ward, Jagdalpur, Distt. Jagdaipur C.G.

¶15

The New India Insu.Co.Ltd. Madina Building, Jail Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G

.é

For Appellants

--——Respondents

-Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate.

¶20

For respondent No.3/lnsurance Company^— Shri Sudhir Agrawai, Advocate with Shri Deepak Umale, DiviIManager.

¶21

ORDER

¶22

(Passed^{on9‘“September,2017)}

¶23

The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also^foundthat the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the

¶24

. contesting parties are just, proper^and legal. There is no legal impediment to i

¶25

”99

¶26

compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the order^{thattheRespondent} compromise/settlement, proposed^bythe parties^and No.3/Insurance Company shall pay R313,4O,000Iby^way of compensation in addition^{totheamountawardedbytheLearnedTribunaltotheappellantswithin6O} days from^today. ln case^theamount is not paid^{withinstipulatedtimethenthe} interest @^9% per^{annumfromthedateofpassingofthiscompromiseaward,shall} also be payable^{tillitsrealization.}

¶27

The compensation amount failing in the share of major appellant shall be disbursed and^{tortheminorappellant,thelearnedtribunal} shall be at liberty^to of minor^{appellantasfixed}

¶28

pass^{anordertodeposittheshare} of compensation deposit^{inanynationalizedbankuntilsheattainstheageofmajority.}

¶29

g£y^{ofthisawardshouldbeprovidedfreeofcostto.thg§partiesimmediately.} r^Xx ’ SdlSd/— vi ‘ . , ~ 7 . l N. Bharat) (PraTulla (R.c‘§.5amant) Member — Lok Adalat Judge —Lok Adalat High^{CourtofChhattisgarh} High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} i Bllaspur Bilaspur

¶30

Nisha

Smt.shivrani Khaaparde And Ors. v. Chingru Ram Baghel And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.shivrani Khaaparde And Ors. v. Chingru Ram Baghel And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tilak Raj Saluja Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rabba Koma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Bhagmania Bai Vs Windrawan

Mahendra Yadav And Anr. Vs Umashankar Pal And Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Dhru Vs Parmanand Manikpuri and Ors.

Suraj Kumar Sonwani Vs Parmanand Manikpuri and Ors.