This order dismisses Contempt Review Petition No. 794 of 2012 for lack of instruction/prosecution by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRR No. 794 of 2012
Devanand Gupta, S/o. Dataram Gupta, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Village Bolga, Police Station Pusour, Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.).
---- Petitioner
Versus
Both R/o. Village Kotma, Police Station- Pusour, Tahsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondents
10.08.2017 Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no
instruction.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Li (Goutam Bhaduri)
Judge
Ashok
Devanand Gupta
Smt. Basanti Gupta
Minor Ku. Suhangani Gupta
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
