The High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an order awarding Rs. 7,000 per month maintenance against a monthly income of Rs. 35,000, holding the amount was reasonable.
Revision petition dismissed without the need for recording evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 513 of 2017
Ajeet Kumar Gautam S/o. Shri R.P. Gautam, aged about 33 years, Resident of Milan Chowk, Kududand, P.S. Civil Line, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Applicant
Versus
Smt. Neetu Gautam W/o. Ajeet Kumar Gautam, aged about 31 Years Resident of Near Pan Mandi, Gurunanak Chowk, Torwa, P.S. Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Arvind Sinha, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Soniya Kuldeep, Advoate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
Order On Board
13.11.2017
2
Sd/(Ram Prasanna Sharma) JUDGE
Santosh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the increased maintenance amount of Rs. 7,000 per month imposed on a monthly income of Rs. 35,000 is unreasonable or disproportionate.
Whether the revision against the maintenance increase has any merit.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajeet Kumar Gautam
Smt. Neetu Gautam
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
