The High Court allowed the applicant's prayer to withdraw the criminal revision after he paid the fine, and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw the revision allowed; revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
^W!V«yKw^n Rg.nr'ft£')®1?u!;'
BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR (C_Xj.i
/3 CRIMINAL REVISION N0. /2006
Gulab Khatri, aged about 37 years, -^" son of Shri Khetmal Khatri, R/o. Gurur, P.S. Gurur, Distt. Durg '^ (C.G.) VERSUS
NON-APPLICANT
State of Chhattisgarh.
CRIMINAL REVLSIOIN UNDERSECTIQN 397_R/W SECTION401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
NAFR
H1GH CQU^tT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
CRRNo.131of2006
• Gulab Khatri
-—Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh
•—Respondent
For Applicant For Respondent-State
Shri NS Dhurandhar, Advocate
Shri Anupam Dubey, Dy. GAforthe State
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
OrderOn Board
07/09/2017
Sd/-
tam Bhaduri
Judge
Ashu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulab Khatri
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
