The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed an application under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court granted leave to file a regular appeal, admitted the matter, and issued notice to respondents.
Leave to appeal granted; case registered as regular appeal; notice issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 13 of 2017
State of Chhattisgarh Versus Mandeep Gupta and Ors.
| 05/05/2017 | Shri Vivek Sharma, Govt. Advocate for the State. |
|---|---|
| Heard on IA No.1 of 2017, application for condonation of delay in filling the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. The present petition has been filed under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal. The petition is allowed. The leave as prayed for is granted. Office is directed to register the case as a regular acquittal appeal. Heard on admission Admit. |
|
| Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F. as per rules. Notice be made returnable within 12 weeks. List the matter for final hearing in due course. |
|
| Nisha | (Pritinker Diwaker) (R.C.S. Samant) Judge Judge |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file a regular appeal under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. should be granted after condoning the delay.
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal needs to be decided.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Chhattisgarh
Mandeep Gupta
And Others
Nisha
Pritinker Diwaker
R.C.S. Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
