The High Court condensed delay and granted leave under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. to the State to file an acquittal appeal. The appeal was registered and listed for final hearing.
Leave to appeal granted; appeal admitted and registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 650 of 2017
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Krishna Kumar Gedam @ Golu
| 18/08/2017 | Shri Avinash Kumar Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the petitioner/State. Heard on I.A.No.1/2017, application for condonation of delay in filing the instant petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the instant petition is condoned. The present petition has been filed under Section 378 (3) of the Cr.P.C., seeking leave to appeal. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, leave as prayed for by the State is granted. Let this CRMP be registered as Acquittal Appeal. The appeal is admitted. After registration of regular appeal, issue fresh notice to the respondent on payment of process fee as per rules making the same returnable within twelve weeks. List the appeal for final hearing in its due course. Sd/ Sd/ |
|---|---|
| sunita | (Pritinker Diwaker) (Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave is granted under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. to the State to file an appeal against an acquittal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh
Krishna Kumar Gedam @ Golu
Sunita
Pritinker Diwaker
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
