The appellant filed an appeal against a criminal order. However, the appellant's counsel stated that the appeal was not pressed on merits because the appellant had already completed his jail sentence. The court accepted this position.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 466 of 2008
Nanheshwar Ram, S/o Rakhouram, aged about 20 years, R/o Village Lodhi, P.S. Shankargarh, Distt. Surguja (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through PS Shankargarh, District Surguja (C.G.)
---- Respondent
| 08/08/2017 | Shri Vivek Tripathi, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, PL for the State. Record shows that the appellant was in custody since 18/09/2006 and the communication dated 6/07/2017 received from the Central Jail, Bilaspur would show that appellant Nanheshwar Ram, S/o Rakhouram has been released on 20/12/2013 after completion of his sentence. Considering the same, learned counsel for the appellant do not want to press the appeal on merits as the appellant has already suffered his jail sentence. |
|---|---|
| Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. | |
| Sd/- | |
| gouri | (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE |
Nanheshwar Ram
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
