In a criminal appeal where the appellant surrendered and suffered jail time, counsel requested non-merits disposal. The High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 100 of 2009
Manoj Kumar S/o Anandi Rajak, aged about 20 years, R/o Village Jondhra, ChokiPachpedi, P.S. Mastori, District Bilaspur, C.G.
---- Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Tarbahar, Distt.-Bilaspur (CG)
---Respondent
| 16/08/2017 | Shri Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, counsel for the appellant. Shri Sangarsh Pandey, Dy. G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has suffered his jail sentence and he do not want to press the appeal on merits. Perusal of the case file would show that appellant was arrested on 17/06/2008, thereafter he was not extended benefit of bail before the court below. The conviction was RI for 5 years under section 489(B) of IPC and fine of Rs.100/- was imposed and in default of payment of fine, further RI for 1 month was ordered for and under section 489 (C) of IPC RI for 3 years was ordered and fine of Rs.100 was imposed and in default of payment of fine, further RI for 1 month was ordered for. Perusal of the appellate court order also shows that appellant was not enlarged on bail. Considering the fact that learned counsel for the appellant do not want to press the appeal on merits as the appellant has suffered the jail sentence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- |
|---|---|
| gouri | (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Manoj Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
