The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution, as no representation was filed by the petitioner in two rounds of hearings.
None. The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 6013 of 2007
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
| For Petitioner | None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | Mr. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board
9/2/2016
Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
C.L. Sharma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
