Dismissed

Anupam Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Aug 2016WPS/3663/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a service transfer order based on personal and family difficulties, holding these as administrative considerations and directing the authority to reconsider the representation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit representation for administrative consideration regarding transfer to a place with medical facilities.

Anupam Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No.3663 of 2016

¶5

Anupam Sharma S/o Late Shri S. D. Sharma, Aged About 28 Years Occupation Service, Assistant Grade- Ill In The Office Of The District Trade And Industries Centre, Bilaspur, R/o Tikrapara, Ramdas Nagar, P. S. Tarbahar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Commerce And Industries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

Additional Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Commerce And Industries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

Director (Industries), Directorate, Udhyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶11

Chief General Manager, District Trade And Industries Centre, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner For Respondent/State

¶14

: Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocate : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, GA

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

¶16

Order On Board

¶17

11/08/2016

¶18

The transfer order is under challenge on the ground of personal difficulties that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from mental problem and grandmother is 91 years old and his sister is studying at Delhi and the petitioner is unmarried.

¶19

None of the grounds raised before this Court warrant interference by this Court, because, these are all matters of administrative consideration. The petitioner has already prefered representation. The competent authority may consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to find out whether it is possible subject to administrative exigency

¶20

¶21

to adjust the petitioner to a place where proper medical facilities are available.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, this petition is finally disposed off.

¶23

Sd/( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge

¶24

Tumane

Anupam Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anupam Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Athnash Ekka Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

The Managing Director, M/s Kitply Industries Ltd. Vs Shri Prabhat Kumar Singh

Santosh Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Pramod Kumar Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Narottam Lal Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rahuldeo Bhardwaj Vs State Of Chhattisgarh