In a writ petition, the Court addressed non-consideration of the petitioner for promotion despite seniority and eligibility. It directed the State to consider statutory representation under relevant 1999 Rules within six months.
Direction to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No.3550 of 2016
Devlal Sahu S/o Chamru Ram Sahu, Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Government Primary School, Madanpur, Block Pandariya, District Kabeerdham (Chhattisgarh).
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Deputy Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
Order on Board
17/08/2016
Heard on admission.
2
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Tiwari
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for promotion by a petitioner eligible under recruitment rules but denied promotion is maintainable without exhausting statutory representation remedies?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Devlal Sahu S/o Chamru Ram Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat & Rural Development
Collector, Kabeerdham
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabeerdham
District Education Officer, Kabeerdham
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pandariya
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
