Per is an order dismissing a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear or file any representation in two rounds after notice. No substantive legal proposition is defined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
®_SOffi
^-
THB jEONSBIiB MaBHS%JPBa SH S?A%_^)ffi[BSSTBa@^B_Tja:BBiaX, BENESI RMPCTR (M.B.) ^^X?<^S-lMt6^'X?<^S-lMt6^'
^^X?<^S-lMt6^'X?<^S-lMt6^'
©•a.se, ef 1998
-s
•:y-
APPLXCAHT
Snt. Himla Saba aged atsout 49 years wlSow of late Kejauraa Sahu Agan Bari W&rker Naya Sarlcanda ^ipolaited as &ssfct»Hahila sal •fflkas Vistar Adh.Usari. slocfc patbarj.a Tahsil Mangela. Bd.stt» Bilaspar M.p»
versus
'-L.
•f,.
BESPOKSHTS
lia; State of igadfaya pradesh Tlir'ough its Secretary, Hahlla & aal viKas Deptt» •yallafcb Ebavaa diopal it.P*
2« CennissiQBer Mafaila & Bal Vikas, vallalsh Efaavaa Eihopal M»p»
3« ecnaial.ssioner, sllaspar Bi.vls.Loia Bilaspur Vi^S.
eollecfcor, Bilaspar M.p»:
^%
5» Chlef Bxeeutj.ve officer, tTila paaciaayat B.tlaspar H.P» 6. SAstrlcfc Hahlla & Bal vikas ©ff.i.cer,Bilaspar M»S>»
HlMBEfi BETITIOM WE.B. SEeTIOH 19 OF miE AmXBIISTRaTIVB TRIBErmlaS aCTt 1S85
lo; Etefealls of the apglicant
3BS per eause tltl®abe>ve<
i^
2» Qetails pf the aespoadents
as per cause tltle above,
:iiaHi
.-{^;';:^r^?T'^S?^ 'li ;;j ^sS^ ?.. JJ '-/. <i;':W. w"^'
NAFR
HIGH CQURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
WPSJ^o.^514of 2005
Smt.Nirmala Sahu • State And Ors.
-— Petitioner Versus -—Respondent
t!i|B£;iii^^'T
For Petitioner None
9
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar IVIishra
Qrder^n Board
04/04/2016
(ilts-'iiiS ]1>!!1!!
•ii
Since there is no representation on behalfofthe petitioner even in two rounds, this Court is leftwith no other option exceptto dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd!lPrashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Mirala
Smt. Nirmala Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
