The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition for withdrawal by the petitioner, allowing him liberty to approach the Tribunal again, subject to withdrawal at his own risk.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to approach the Tribunal again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No.1402 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India Through The General Manager (G.M.), S.E.C.R., Zonal Office Building, Civil & Revenue Distt. Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Divisional Railway Manager, (D.R.M.) S.E.C.R. Office Of Divisional Railway Manager, (D.R.M. Office) Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Jameel Akhtar Lohani, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board by P. Diwaker, J
15.6.2016
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the Tribunal again.
Sd/Sd/(Pritinker Diwaker) (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE JUDGE
Bini
Krishna Kumar Sahu
Union Of India
Pritinker Diwaker
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
