Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance despite multiple calls and absence of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPCR No. 177 of 2016
---- Petitioners
Versus
–---Respondents
28/11/2016 None for the petitioners.
Shri Anupam Dubey, Dy.G.A. for the State.
The matter was passed over once in absence of any
representation on behalf of the petitioners.
No one appears for the petitioners even in the
second call.
In the circumstances, there is no other option left with
the court but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
Manish Nigam
Ku. Deepa Nigam
The Superintendent, Central Jail Bilaspur
The Inspector General ( Jail), Raipur
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
