The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of several consolidated writ petitions on an identical basis, relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Hindustan Zinc Limited v. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission in Civil Appeal No. 4417 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 603 of 2012
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 212 of 2012
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 484 of 2012
Bharat Aluminium Company Limited, Balco Nagar, Korba, Chhattisgarh, Through its duly authorised officer.
---- Petitioner
2
Versus
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Irrigation Colony, Shanti Nagar, Raipur, through its Secretary.
---- Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No. 748 of 2012
Lafarge India Private Ltd. having its Eastern Operations Office at 22, Camac Street, 4th Floor, Block 'd' Kolkata 700016 and Corporate and Registered office at Crescenzo, 10th Floor, C-38 and C-39, "G" Block Bandra Kurla, Mumbai 40051 Maharashtra.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 227 of 2015
M/s. Rameshwaram Steel & Power Limited, A company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 11, Masjid Moth, Greater Kailash Part II, PS CR Park, New Delhi and FActory at Chhal Road, Badegumda, Gharghoda, Tahsil and P.S. Gharghoda, District RAigarh, Chhattisgarh, Through its Authorised Signatory Sanjay Sahu.
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 576 of 2013
Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited, A company incorporated under Companies Act, having its Registered Office at Mandir Hasoud, Raipur, 496001 Chhattisgarh. Through its authorised signatory Shri Brajnandan Sinha, aged about 58 years, Assistant General Manager, Monnet Ispat & Energy Limited, 13, Geetanjali Enclave, Ring Road-2 Gaurav Path, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, P.S. Civil Line.
---- Petitioner
3
Versus
---- Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 2010 of 2012
M/s. NALWA Sponge Iron Limited (Now M/s. NALWA Steel & Power Limited) Taraimal Gharghoda Road, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Through Authorised Signatory Shri Anjuj Jaiswal, Dy. General Manager (F&A) & Dy. Cmpany Secretary, M/s. NALWA Steel & Power Limited.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
For Respondents : Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocates.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.
Order on Board
Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice
28/01/2016
4
the parties are therefore agreed that the writ petitions may be disposed in terms of
the same.
Sd/Sd/(Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Amit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether multiple writ petitions challenging regulatory orders must be disposed of in terms of a recent Supreme Court judgment covering the same controversy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hindustan Zinc Limited v. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory CommissionFollowed¶63
Civil Appeal No. 4417 of 2015 (Hindustan Zinc Limited v. Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission)
Civil Appeals No. 4418-4420 of 2015Followed¶63
Civil Appeals No. 4421-4422 of 2015Followed¶63
Jindal Steel & Power Limited and others
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission and Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency
Navin Sinha
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
