The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition filed by a temple trustee challenging the construction of a ropeway. The court held the petition un Maintainable as it was filed pro bono without seeking personal relief and directed filing a WP(PIL).
The writ petition is dismissed; directed to prefer WP(PIL).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 3050 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mrs. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Prafull Bharat, Additional Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
14/12/2016
Sd/Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed by a trustee challenging the construction of a ropeway at a temple, without claiming personal relief, is maintainable.
Sanjay Agrawal
Union Of India
State Of Chhattisgarh
Shri Ma Bamleshwari Mandir Trust Samiti
M/s Conveyor & Ropeway Services Pvt. Ltd.
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
