Mission Higher Secondary School v. Union Of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a show-cause notice for alleged arrears and demand of damages. Court directed the Provident Fund Organization to decide the reply within eight weeks without coercive steps.
What did the court decide?
Direction to petitioner No.2 to decide and pass reasoned order within eight weeks. No coercive steps to be taken.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 3 of 2016
- Mission Higher Secondary School Bilaspur, Through Its Principal, Mission Higher Secondary, Brihaspati Bazar, Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)
---- Petitioner
Versus
- Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Labour, New Delhi.
- Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through Its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office Block- D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Vyavsayik Parishar, Pandri, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
- Enforcement Officer, Office Of The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office Block- D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Vyavsayik Parishar, Pandri, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
- State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the workforce must pay a lump-sum as directed by respondent No.2 on failure to comply with the notice issued
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mission Higher Secondary School Bilaspur, Through Its Principal
- respondent
Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Labour
- respondent
Employees Provident Fund Organization
- respondent
Enforcement Officer, Office Of The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/3/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court