Court allowed application to bring legal representatives on record due to petitioner's death during pendency before separately disposing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
W.P.(C) No. 177 of 2014
Jethuram @ Jethu Yadaw Versus State of Chhattisgarh
| 09.08.2016 | Shri Roop Naik, counsel for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Satish Gupta, G.A. for the State. Heard on I.A. No. 08/16, application for bringing legal representatives on record. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner Jethuram Yadav expired on 14.07.2016 leading to the filing of this application for bringing the LRs of the petitioner on record. It is not opposed by the State counsel. Accordingly, I.A. No.08 is allowed. Let necessary amendment be incorporated during the course of the day. The petition is disposed of by an order separately passed today. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge |
|
| Bhola |
Jethuram @ Jethu Yadaw
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
