Rajesh Kumar Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Th ;- a \ PETTHONER <^^~ ^~^~'' IN THE HIGH…
Th ;- a \ PETTHONER <^^~ ^~^~'' IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
;ii-i:rvz^^irt>.J£A/iA^'^^
IN THE HIGH CBURT OF CtIHATn5GAR AT BILASPUR
Vftit Fetiti(g»N6.<L5/2008
PETTHONER RqeshKianarTlwari, S/oSiri& L
Th ^Tiwari, agedabout42yeara>
woddmg m Semor Bxisthetic and OthBUc
;-a\ Engmieer(Atjaesent Inchatge Officer
State Resoutce Genter, Raipur) 'B^o
"Laksha Darshan", Opponte Uteav Vatika,
<^^~ ManglaGhowl^Raipur(Ca)(CG).
^^''
• 1
.-Vexsts- . .
^LStaterfChhatysgatli,
ThFEnighSeeretaiy, Sodal 'Wdfare
rv3n^ Mai'ilralayatc
D. K. & Hhawan, Shastri ChDwl^
Raipur(CG).
".-- 'cr
\i JbmtDiracba; ^=i-
TrieasiayandAacotait^:;'^s:N-< ''^?
' ' '-
NearNutanCdotiy,
aiaqwr(CG) ?g—<^
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/23^ OFTHE CCmSTmj^ONOFHifflAM^^SStrA^B^^A^^W^ THE NATURE OF MANDftMUS. ^ PRQHIBmON. CEJRTIORARI ETC.OR &8Y C ^K DISECTIOS OR ORDERTODOJUSTICEINTHEMATTER.
DetaUs crf tt»pelition. ICULAROFTHEPEmiONm; percausetitle.
-ya
/
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
WP No. 45 of 2003
| 04/08/2016 | Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Versus State OfChhattisgarh & Ors. Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Advocate forthe petitioner. Mr. Anil S Pandey,'Govt. Advocate forthe State. l-1eard on I.A. No. 1- Application for withdrawal of the petition. On due consideration, I.A. No. 1 is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|---|---|
| "&S. fcS-.SB" santosh |
Sd/- GoutamBhaduri Judge :^. ^, t^.<r'b';. |
i-:^'iti.»';
Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court