Disposed

Awadh Bihari Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Apr 2016WP/2412/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition concerning the petitioner's unpaid traveling allowance of Rs. 60,000 after finding that other dues were settled and the petitioner never joined service post-interim relief.

What did the court decide?

Direct payment of Rs. 60,000 to petitioner within two months; leave to approach competent authority within one month regarding any further unpaid dues.

Awadh Bihari Singh Vs Union of India… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

VI. P. N0. 2412 OF 2002

¶4

PETITIONER

¶5

Awadh Bihari Singh,S/o Shri Ram Avatar Singh,aged about 42 years, Occupation-Service, presently posted^as Krishi Vikas Adhikari,Bl'ck Manvahi District ~ Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

RESPONDENTS

¶8

Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of the Personnel 8s Public Grievance 8s Pension (State Reorg'tion) Govt. of India, New Delhi.

¶9

¶10

¶11

Director, State Reorgzation (Department of Personnel & Training), Government of India, New Delhi.

¶12

The State of Chhattisgarh thru' Secretary, Departanent of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) State of Madhya Pradesh Thru' Secretaiy, Department of Agriculture, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal (M P) Director (Horticulture), Chhattisgarh, Raipur ( C.G.) Director (Horticulture), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal(MP) Assistant Land Conservation Officer, Sub Division Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (C.G) Assistant Director (Horticulturej Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G) Assistant Director (Horticulture]

¶13

Jashpurnagar, District Jashpurnagar (Chhattisgarh)

¶14

WRIT PETITIQN UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA^'QR ISSUANCE OF WRITJN NATURE OF MAifDAMUS PROHIBITION AND OT3IER SUJTABLE^ WRITL ^R ^WRITS,_ DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS, ORDER OR QRDERS:

¶15

,^"BS"a^.
,4-:f"<'r°'<<br>;""^ 'fe,. .^y- .^s
A^\rAj}^
v

¶16

¶17

NAFR

¶18

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR

WP No. 241ZM2002

Awadh Bihari Singh

-—Petitioner

Versus

Union Of India & Ors.

¶24

-—Respondent

¶25

For Petitioner Shri AJroJ Khan, Advocate For Respondents-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State with Shri J.S. Kakaria, Deputy Director (Agriculture), . Bilaspur

¶26

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant KumarJVllshra

¶27

Order On Board

¶28

08/04/2016

¶29

Learned State counsel would inform, on instructions, that the petitioner was allowed interim relief on 20-12-02, however, he never turned up forjoining and serving in the department. It is also stated by learned State counsel that a sum of Rs.60,000/- remains to be paid to the petitioner on account of the bills of Traveling Allowance submitted by the petitioner and all other dues have been paid to the petitioner.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner would not dispute the statement, however, he would pray that the amount of Rs.60.000/- may be directed to be paid forthwith.

¶31

In view of the above, controversy involved in this writ petition now survives only for the amount of Rs.60,000/-, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of

¶32

\ \

¶33

with a direction to the respondents to pay the above stated amount of Rs.60,000/- to the petitioner within a period of two months from today. If any other amount remains unpaid, the petitioner may prefer a representation before the competent authority within a period of one month, which shall also be decided in accordance with law within a further period of three months.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

Judge

¶36

Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶37

Ashu

Awadh Bihari Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Awadh Bihari Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harihar Prasad Singh Vs K. Marugan

State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. Vs Chaituram Yadav And Anr.

State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. Vs Kartikram And Anr.

Government of M.P. Now C.G. and Anr. Vs Smt. Kachra Bai

Madan Singh Nag Vs State

Kashi Vishwanath Rao Jhadhav Vs State