Anil Kumar Dhruw v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order rejecting a claim for compassionate appointment to a government service post.
The High Court dismissed a writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's order rejecting a claim for compassionate appointment to a government service post.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No.413 of 2016
Anil Kumar Dhruw S/o Late Shri Vishnu Prasad Dhruw, Aged about 25 years, R/o Village Khamhariya, Tahsil and Block Baloda Bazar, DistrictBaloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)
---- Appellant
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, District-Raipur (CG)
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Arvind Sinha, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Kachhawaha, Addl.A.G.
Hon’ble Shri Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
Per Deepak Gupta, Chief Justice
26/09/2016
2
“3. The facts, as stated on the face of this petition, are that the father of the petitioner died while he was working in Government Service as Teacher on 16.10.1999. According to the petitioner himself he was a minor aged about 9 years. It appears that after almost 11 years, claim for compassionate appointment was made on behalf of the petitioner, by his mother which was rejected in the year 2012. With all sympathy, compassionate appointment is not an alternative source of employment in Government service. The object and purpose of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate succor to the family of deceased-employee, who died in harness. The basic object is to save the family from starvation and financial stress. In the very nature of the policy, the compassionate appointment is to be granted to a major and dependent member of the family. In the present case, the application itself was moved after 11 years. There is nothing on record to show that such an eventuality has been covered under the policy of compassionate appointment.
3
petitioner after more than 4 years of rejection of his representation.”
Sd/- Sd/(Deepak Gupta) (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Chief Justice Judge
Bablu
Anil Kumar Dhruw
State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of Education
The Director, Education Department
The Collector, Baloda Bazar
District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar
The Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Lahod
Deepak Gupta
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court